This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Yoshida, Y. Articles by Van Meerbeek, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yoshida, Y. Articles by Van Meerbeek, B. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB CALCIUM COMPOUNDS HYDROXYAPATITE Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparative Study on Adhesive Performance of Functional Monomers

¹ Department of Biomaterials, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 700-8525, Japan;
² Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama 700-8525, Japan;
³ Department of Biomaterials Science, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomaterials Science, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan;
⁴ Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomaterials Science, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan;
⁵ Research Planning Department, Toray Research Center, Inc., Sonoyama 3-3-7, Otsu, Shiga 520-8567, Japan;
⁶ Division for General Dentistry, Hokkaido University Dental Hospital, Kita 13 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan;
⁷ Institute of Experimental Animals, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan; and
⁸ Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium;

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. XPS wide-scan spectra of untreated hydroxyapatite (a), of hydroxyapatite treated with 15% (w/w) 4-MET for 30 sec (b), of hydroxyapatite treated with 15% (w/w) 10-MDP for 30 sec (c), of hydroxyapatite treated with 15% (w/w) 4-MET for 30 min (d), of hydroxyapatite treated with phenyl-P for 30 min (e), and of hydroxyapatite treated with 10-MDP for 30 min (f).

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. (a) XPS narrow-scan spectra of the C 1s region of 4-META (4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride) powder (top spectrum) and of hydroxyapatite treated with 15% (w/w) 4-MET for 30 min (bottom spectrum). Peak deconvolution revealed that almost all carbon originated from 4-MET, with a peak at 284.6 eV representing C-C, C-H, and C=C bindings, a peak at 286.1 eV representing C-O bindings, and a peak representing ester and carboxyl groups. As compared with 4-META powder (288.6 eV), the carboxyl peak had shifted to a lower binding energy (288.3 eV). Deconvolution of the shifted peak disclosed a peak at 288.6 eV, representing the ester function and unreacted carboxyl groups, and a peak at 288.2 eV that represents carboxyl groups that reacted with the Ca of hydroxyapatite. It should be mentioned that the peak position and intensity of the C-O component (top spectrum) for 4-META powder are slightly different from what theoretically would be expected, and from the C-O subpeak in the bottom spectrum. This must be attributed to impurities within the 4-META powder sample that were readily removed during the adhesive treatment. (b) XPS narrow-scan spectra of the C 1s region of untreated phenyl-P (top spectrum) and of hydroxyapatite treated with 15% (w/w) phenyl-P (bottom spectrum). (c) XPS narrow-scan spectra of the C1s region of untreated 10-MDP (top spectrum) and of hydroxyapatite treated with 15% (w/w) 10-MDP (bottom spectrum). Peak deconvolution revealed that almost all carbon originated from 10-MDP on hydroxyapatite, with a peak at 284.6 eV representing C-C, C-H, and C=C bindings, a peak at 286.1 eV representing C-O bindings, and a peak representing ester at 288.6eV. In high-resolution XPS C 1s spectra, aliphatic carbon shows a large asymmetry due to vibrational effect, while aromatic carbon is symmetrical (Beamson and Briggs, 1992). Therefore, the peak at 284.6 eV representing C-C, C-H, and C=C bindings of 10-MDP is expressed with an asymmetrical shape.

View larger version (90K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. TEM photomicrographs illustrating the resin-dentin interfaces produced by Unifil Bond (GC) (a,b), Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (Kuraray) (c), and Clearfil SE (Kuraray) (d,e). The photomicrographs in (a) and (d) represent unstained, non-demineralized sections, those in (b) and (e) stained, demineralized sections, and that in (c) a stained, non-demineralized section. A = adhesive resin; H = hybrid layer; L = lab-demineralized unaffected dentin; R = resin-impregnated smear plug; U = unaffected dentin.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. 6, 454-458 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300604


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?