This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Murphy, W.L. Articles by Mooney, D.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Murphy, W.L. Articles by Mooney, D.J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bone Regeneration via a Mineral Substrate and Induced Angiogenesis

¹ Department of Biomedical Engineering, ² Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, and ³ Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, 5213 Dental, 1011 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078;

View larger version (77K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Imaging of mineralized scaffolds and measurement of VEGF release kinetics. (A) Electron micrographs displaying 85:15 PLG scaffolds with an interconnected pore structure (250 < d < 425 µm). Scale bar = 1 mm. (A, inset) The surface of a single pore within the scaffold coated with a thin biomineral film (scale bar = 60 µm). (B) The biomineral film displays a platelike nanostructure similar to that of native bone mineral (scale bar = 20 µm). Biomineralization was achieved via incubation of pre-hydrolyzed scaffolds in mSBF for 5 days. (C) In vitro release kinetics of VEGF from mineralized scaffolds. Data in plot represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 5).

View larger version (64K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. VEGF release enhances blood vessel ingrowth 2 wks post-implantation. (A-D) vWF immunostaining of blood vessels within sections of implanted PLG (A), mineralized PLG (B), and VEGF-releasing, mineralized PLG (C) scaffolds. Positive vWF staining is brown, and circular vWF staining represents a blood vessel. (D) Higher-magnification image of a different region within a VEGF-releasing, mineralized PLG scaffold. (E) Quantification of blood vessel densities within the total scaffold area and a region in the center of the scaffold for each condition. *P < 0.01 relative to the PLG condition; **P < 0.01 relative to the mineralized PLG condition (n = 4 for MIN; n = 6 for PLG and MIN + VEGF). Data in plot represent mean ± standard deviation. Scale bars = 100 µm (in A-C) or 20 µm (in D). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.

View larger version (71K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Mineralized scaffolds support enhanced bone tissue ingrowth, and biomineral presence significantly enhances osteoid matrix deposition. (A,B) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of sections of a critical-sized defect without an implanted scaffold (A) and a defect after implantation of a mineralized, VEGF-releasing PLG scaffold (B). Bridging of the defect area with tissue was evident for all three experimental conditions (data not shown). (C-E) Higher-magnification H&E staining of implanted PLG (C), mineralized PLG (D), and VEGF-releasing, mineralized PLG (E) scaffolds 14 wks postimplantation. (F-H) Goldner’s trichrome staining of implanted PLG (F), mineralized PLG (G), and VEGF-releasing, mineralized PLG (H) scaffolds 14 wks post-implantation (red = osteoid matrix). (I) Quantification of osteoid matrix fractional area within the scaffold area for each condition. *P < 0.05 relative to the PLG condition (n = 5 for PLG and MIN; n = 6 for MIN + VEGF). Data in plot represent mean ± standard deviation. Scale bar = 1 mm (in A-B) or 100 µm (in C-H).

View larger version (68K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Biomineral presence and induced angiogenesis concertedly enhance mineralized tissue regeneration. (A-C) von Kossa staining of implanted PLG (A), mineralized PLG (B), and VEGF-releasing, mineralized PLG (C) scaffolds 14 wks post-implantation (dark purple-black = mineralized tissue) displaying bone regeneration in the interior of the scaffold. (D) Quantification of mineralized tissue fractional area within the scaffold area for each condition. *P = 0.065 relative to the PLG condition; **P < 0.01 relative to the PLG condition; ***P < 0.01 relative to the mineralized PLG condition (n = 5 for PLG and MIN; n = 6 for MIN + VEGF). Data in plot represent mean ± standard deviation. Scale bars = 100 µm.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. 3, 204-210 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?