This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Keila, S. Articles by Weinreb, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Keila, S. Articles by Weinreb, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

In vitro Effects of Enamel Matrix Proteins on Rat Bone Marrow Cells and Gingival Fibroblasts

¹ Departments of Oral Biology and
² Periodontology, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel;

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Nodule formation by BMSC. (A) Representative wells stained with the Von-Kossa method showing more mineralized nodules in cultures treated with Emdogain (EMD) at 25 µg/mL. (B) Quantitation of the number of nodules/well (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). Only EMD at 25 µg/mL increased nodule number. ***P < 0.005 (EMD at 25 µg/mL vs. control or 100 µg/mL). (C) Quantitation of the dish area covered with mineralized nodules (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). Only EMD at 25 µg/mL increased nodule area. ***P < 0.005 (EMD at 25 µg/mL vs. control or 100 µg/mL).

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. (A) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of BMSC is enhanced by Emdogain (EMD) at 25 µg/mL (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). **P < 0.01 (EMD vs. control). (B) Quantitation of the number of nodules/well (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). EMD (25 µg/mL) was added immediately upon seeding (Time 0) or 48 hrs later, after removal of non-adherent cells. Only EMD at time 0 increased nodule formation. ***P < 0.005 (EMD at Time 0 vs. control or EMD at 48 hrs). (C) EMD (25 µg/mL) increases the number of adherent BMSC at 48 hrs (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). ***P < 0.005 (EMD vs. control). (D) EMD (25 µg/mL) increases the protein content of BMSC cultures on day 10 (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). *P < 0.05 (EMD vs. control).

View larger version (40K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. GF cultures. (A) Representative wells after Von-Kossa staining showing no mineralization but darker color of the matrix, with a greater effect of Emdogain (EMD) at 100 µg/mL than at 25 µg/mL. (B) Average optical density in arbitrary units of the GF matrix. Since darker color is associated with lower OD values (255 = white, 0 = black), the matrix of GF cells treated with EMD stains more intensely (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). ***P < 0.005 vs. control. (C) The protein content of GF cultures increases with the EMD concentration (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.005 (vs. control).

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Emdogain (EMD, 100 µg/mL) increases GF cell number, determined on days 2, 5, or 12 (mean ± SE, N = 6/group). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005 (vs. the respective control).

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. 2, 134-138 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300210


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?