Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, X.
Right arrow Articles by Amar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, X.
Right arrow Articles by Amar, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

IGF-1 Signaling Enhances Cell Survival in Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts vs. Gingival Fibroblasts

X. Han and S. Amar1,*

Department of Periodontology & Oral Biology, Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, 700 Albany Street, W-201E, Boston, MA, 02118, USA;


Figure 1
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. In situ detection of apoptosis. (A,B) Formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded healthy periodontal tissues of 4 molar teeth from 2 monkeys were analyzed by means of a TUNEL detection kit (Boehringer Mannheim). TUNEL-positive cells are arrowed. (C) The apoptotic cell percentage was obtained as the ratio of TUNEL-positive cells relative to the total number of counted fibroblasts. (D) The apoptotic cell density was expressed as TUNEL-positive cells per mm2. Mean ± SD (n = 12). **p < 0.01, t test, difference between PDLF and GF. Ce, cementum; PDL, periodontal ligament; AvB, alveolar bone; DG, deep gingiva.

 

Figure 2
Figure 2
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. The role of IGF-1 signaling on PDLF vs. GF. Human PDLF and GF were cultured in six-well plates and were treated with IGF-1 and LY294002 as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. (A-D) We used flow cytometry to detect the annexin V-FITC-generated signal at 488 nm (FL1-H). The shadowed area represents fluorescent intensity distribution of PDLF cells. The area under the bold line represents fluorescent intensity distribution of GF cells. (E) The extent of DNA fragmentation was assessed by the diphenylamine (DPA) assay as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. (F) Cell lysate was analyzed by Western blot. Phosphorylated proteins were detected by the use of antibodies against phospho-PKB (Ser473) and phospho-Bad (Ser112). Antibodies against PKB or Bad were also used for detection of the total amount of PKB or Bad in the lysate. (G) We used an ELISA system (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to determine the concentration of active caspase 3 by measuring the optical density at 450 nm. All bar graphs represent Mean ± SD, n = 4. *p < 0.05, t test, difference between PDLF and GF. D, serum-free DMEM. F, DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. I, 10-8 M IGF-1. LY, 10-6 M LY294002.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Expression of bcl-2 family genes between PDLF and GF. Human PDLF and GF were cultured, and apoptosis was induced by serum deprivation as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. The mRNA levels of bcl-2 family members were measured by RNase protection assay for anti-apoptotic genes (A,B) and pro-apoptotic genes (C,D). Radioactive signals were quantified with a PhosphorImager equipped with IMAGEQUANT software (Molecular Dynamics). A GAPDH probe was used as an internal control. Mean ± SD, n = 3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, t test, difference between PDLF and GF.

 

Figure 4
Figure 4
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Up-regulation of IGFBP-5 in PDLF. (A) Human PDLF and GF were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS until sub-confluent. Total RNA (0.2 µg each) was extracted from cells of passages 4 and 7, and gene-specific primers (1 µM) were used for amplification of IGFBP-5 by RT-PCR. Human β-actin control primers (0.2 µM) were used as internal standard. (B) The cell samples from passage 4 were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE with Western blotting and human IGFBP-5 antibody. (C,D) Sections of healthy periodontal tissues from Macaca mulatta monkeys were analyzed by immunohistochemistry as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. Cells immunoreactive for IGFBP-5 are indicated by arrows. Ce, cementum; PDL, periodontal ligament; AvB, alveolar bone; DG, deep gingiva.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 82, No. 6, 454-459 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910308200610


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?