Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lobner, D
Right arrow Articles by Asrari, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lobner, D
Right arrow Articles by Asrari, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Neurotoxicity of Dental Amalgam is Mediated by Zinc

D Lobner1,* and M Asrari2

1 Dept. of Biomedical Sciences and
2 Dept. of Endodontics, Marquette University, 561 N. 15th Street, Rm. 426, Milwaukee, WI 53201;


Figure 1
Figure 1
View larger version (242K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Cortical cell cultures with amalgam (dark shadow on left) placed on culture insert acutely (A) and after 24 hrs (B). Scale bar = 50 µm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Amalgam toxicity, but not mercury toxicity, was blocked by the metal chelator, CaEDTA, while the mercury chelator, DMPS, blocked mercury toxicity but not amalgam toxicity. (A) Amalgam, 0.010 + 0.002 mg; DMPS, 100 µM 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulphonate; CaEDTA, 1 mM calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate. Amalgam was placed in tissue culture inserts so that it was exposed to the same media as the cells but was not in direct physical contact with the cells. Bars show % cell death (mean + SEM, n = 12). (B) Hg; 5 µM HgCl2. Bars show % cell death (mean + SEM, n = 8-16). Cell death was quantified by the measurement of release of LDH, 24 hrs after the beginning of the insult. Sham wash values were subtracted, and results were scaled to the level measured in sister cultures exposed to 10 µM A23187 for 24 hrs (n = 100; this exposure induced near-complete cell death). * indicates significant difference from control amalgam or mercury toxicity.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. CaEDTA attenuated zinc (Zn) toxicity, but not tin (Sn), copper (Cu), or silver (Ag) toxicity. Zn, ZnCl2; Sn, SnCl2; Cu, CuCl2; Ag, AgNO3; CaEDTA, 1 mM calcium disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate. Bars show % cell death (mean + SEM, n = 6-16) quantified by the measurement of LDH release (A,B,C) or trypan blue staining (D), 24 hrs after the beginning of the insult. Sham wash values were subtracted, and results were scaled to the level measured in sister cultures exposed to 10 µM A23187 for 24 hrs. * indicates significant difference from the control metal toxicity.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 82, No. 3, 243-246 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910308200318


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?