This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Alsberg, E. Articles by Mooney, D.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alsberg, E. Articles by Mooney, D.J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Regulating Bone Formation via Controlled Scaffold Degradation

¹ Departments of Biomedical Engineering,
² Chemical Engineering, and
³ Biologic and Materials Sciences, Room 5213 Dental School, 1011 North University, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078, USA;

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Gamma-irradiation decreases the average molecular weight of alginate polymer chains and increases its biodegradation rate in vivo. (A) Average molecular weight of alginate as a function of radiation dose. Experimental values are reported as mean (N = 3) ± SD. Gross appearance of explanted gels formed from (B) 0 Mrad 2% alginate and (C) 8 Mrad 3% alginate after 12 wks’ subcutaneous implantation in the backs of SCID mice. [Size bar in photomicrographs (B) and (C) represents 6 mm.] Photomicrographs of H/E-stained histological sections of (D) non-irradiated and (E) 8-Mrad-irradiated hydrogels at 12 wks. [Size bar in photomicrographs (D) and (E) represents 200 µm. A = residual alginate, F = fibrous tissue.] (F) Change in implant mass over time. [Experimental values are reported as mean (N = 4-5) ± SD. (*) indicates a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in implant mass between irradiated alginate and non-irradiated alginate control at a specific time point. () 0 Mrad 2% alginate, (•) 5 Mrad 2% alginate, () 8 Mrad 3% alginate.]

View larger version (129K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Transplantation of osteoblasts in alginate with increased degradation rate resulted in qualitatively improved bone formation. Photomicrographs of (A-D) H/E and (E-F) Goldner’s Trichrome-stained histological sections of tissues formed from primary rat calvarial osteoblasts transplanted in (A,C,E) 0 Mrad 2% alginate-G4RGDSP and (B,D,F) 8 Mrad 2% alginate-G4RGDSP after 6, 13, and 21 wks’ subcutaneous implantation. [Size bar in photomicrographs represents 200 µm. A = residual alginate, B = bone tissue.]

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Transplantation of osteoblasts in alginate with increased degradation rate resulted in quantitatively improved bone formation. Change in tissue-engineered (A) bone mass, (B) BMC, and (C) BMD over time. (D) Histomorphometric quantification of implant bone fraction over time. [Experimental values are reported as mean (N = 4-5) ± SD. (*) indicates a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference between irradiated alginate and non-irradiated alginate control at a specific time point.]

View larger version (52K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Increased polymer degradation rate results in improved bone microarchitecture as demonstrated by µCT images. µCT image slices of (A) 0 Mrad 2% alginate-G4RGDSP + PRCO and (B) 8 Mrad 2% alginate-G4RGDSP + PRCO after 21 wks. [Image reconstructions are at a resolution of 18 µm; size bars represent 3 mm.]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 82, No. 11, 903-908 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910308201111


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?