Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, B.H.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, B.H.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Activation of Vanilloid Receptor 1 (VR1) by Eugenol

B.H. Yang*, Z.G. Piao*, Y.-B. Kim, C.-H. Lee, J.K. Lee, K. Park, J.S. Kim and S.B. Oh#

Department of Physiology, College of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 28-2 Yeongeon-Dong ChongNo-Ku, Seoul, Korea 110-749;


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Eugenol activated inward currents in VR1-expressing HEK 293 cells. (A) The current profiles induced by the application of eugenol (1 mM) and capsaicin (1 µM). The holding potential was -60 mV. (B) The inward current activated by eugenol was completely inhibited by RR (10 µM) and CZP (10 µM). Since the eugenol-activated currents by the first and second applications were not significantly different (top trace), the eugenol-activated currents were compared after cells were pre-treated with either RR for 1.5 min prior to the second application of eugenol and RR (middle trace) or CZP for 1.5 min prior to the second application of eugenol and CPZ (bottom trace).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effects of eugenol on [Ca2+]i in VR1-expressing HEK 293 cells. (A) Eugenol (1 mM) increased [Ca2+]i in a capsaicin-responsive cell. Carbachol (CCh, 10 µM), as a positive control, evoked Ca transient through muscarinic receptors endogenously expressed on the cells. The eugenol-induced Ca transient was abolished by CZP (10 µM) (B) and RR (10 µM) (C).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Eugenol evoked inward currents in capsaicin-responsive TG neurons. (A) Eugenol (1 mM) and capsaicin (1 µM) activated inward currents in the same cells. Eugenol-induced inward currents were blocked by RR (10 µM) (B) and CZP (10 µM) (C). Due to the difference of current amplitude, the current traces in C were displayed separately although measured in the same cell.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effects of eugenol on [Ca2+]i in capsaicin-responsive TG neurons. (A) Eugenol (1 mM) increased [Ca2+]i. The enhancement of [Ca2+]i was abolished by CZP (10 µM) (B) and RR (C). Capsaicin (1 µM), as a positive control, also evoked Ca transient (A), which was completely abolished by CZP (10 µM) (B) and RR (10 µM) (C).

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 82, No. 10, 781-785 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910308201004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?