This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Noda, M. Articles by Sano, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Noda, M. Articles by Sano, H. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Components of Dentinal Adhesives Modulate Heat Shock Protein 72 Expression in Heat-stressed THP-1 Human Monocytes at Sublethal Concentrations

¹ Department of Oral Health Science, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Kita 13, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan;
² Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-1260; and
³ Department of Oral Functional Science, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. SDH activity of THP-1 monocytes exposed to HEMA and TEGDMA for 7 hrs and measured by the MTT method, with (open circles) and without (solid circles) heat stress at 43°C for 1 hr. Upper-case letters indicate statistical comparisons between concentrations within the no-heat group (ANOVA, Tukey, = 0.05). Lower-case letters show statistical comparisons among the heat-stressed groups. Heat-stressed vs. unstressed controls at the highest concentrations of HEMA and TEGDMA exposure were statistically different (two-tailed t test, p = 10-10 for HEMA, 10-7 for TEGDMA).

View larger version (81K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. HSP72 expression shown in a typical SDS-PAGE gel and Western blotting for TEGDMA with and without 1 hr of heat stress and recovery for 2, 4, or 6 hrs. The expression of HSP72 with silver stain is denoted on the gel (arrow), and the Western blot of HSP72 is shown at the bottom.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. HSP72 expression after HEMA and TEGDMA exposure as a percentage of the six-hour, no-resin controls (arbitrarily set to 100%). Cells were heat-stressed for 1 hr, followed by 2, 4, or 6 hrs of recovery. The letter ‘D‘ indicates a statistical comparison among the heat-stressed groups with six-hour recovery and various resin concentrations. Lower-case letters denote a statistical difference from the no-resin (upper-case) control (ANOVA, Dunnett's, = 0.05). The letter ‘C’ compares the four-hour recovery groups at various resin concentrations, whereas ‘B‘ compares two-hour recovery, and ‘A‘ compares the no-heat-stress groups.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 81, No. 4, 265-269 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100408


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?