This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Härkänen, T. Articles by Arjas, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Härkänen, T. Articles by Arjas, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Applying Modern Survival Analysis Methods to Longitudinal Dental Caries Studies

¹ Rolf Nevanlinna Institute, PO Box 4, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; and
² Department of Preventive Dentistry and Cariology, Institute of Dentistry, PO Box 5281, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland;

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Posterior expectation of survival function of maxillary molar and incisor teeth with 95% pointwise credibility intervals. The dashed line corresponds to the 1960 cohort (n = 193), the thin solid line to the 1970 cohort (n = 1927), and the thick solid line to the 1980 cohort (n = 1952). The vertical lines correspond to the 95% pointwise credibility intervals. The panels A, C, E, and G represent boys, and B, D, F, and H girls. The panels A and B stand for second molars, C and D for first molars, E and F for lateral incisors, and G and H for central incisors.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Posterior expectations of the failure hazard rates of maxillary molar and incisor teeth. The dashed line corresponds to the 1960 cohort (n = 193), the thin solid line to the 1970 cohort (n = 1927), and the thick solid line to the 1980 cohort (n = 1952). The vertical lines correspond to the 95% pointwise credibility intervals (excluding the 1960 cohort due to small sample size). The panels A, C, E, and G represent boys, and B, D, F, and H girls. The panels A and B stand for second molars, C and D for first molars, E and F for lateral incisors, and G and H for central incisors. In the 1980 cohort, the risk of failure is constant, except in central incisors, and the age of the tooth thus does not affect the risk of failure. (Log-scale on the vertical axis ranges from 0.1 to 50.)

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Posterior expectations of the failure hazard rates for the 1960 cohort containing boys (n = 103) and girls (n = 90). The panels A and B represent boys, and C and D girls. The panels A and C stand for the maxilla, and B and D for the mandible. Molar teeth have the highest failure risk after eruption, with the exception of mandibular first molars, which have the highest risk approximately two years after eruption. (Log-scale on the vertical axis ranges from 1 to 50.)

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 81, No. 2, 144-148 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100212


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?