Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, C.G.
Right arrow Articles by Nekula, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Widmer, C.G.
Right arrow Articles by Nekula, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Spatial Distribution of Myosin Heavy-chain Isoforms in Mouse Masseter

C.G. Widmer*, J.A. Morris-Wiman and C. Nekula

Dept. of Orthodontics, Box 100444, JHMHSC, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0444;


Figure 1
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Mouse masseter muscle anatomy depicted for each layer of the muscle: superficial (A), intermediate (B), and deep (C). Tendons of origin (tendon a and tendon b) and insertion (tendon c) are shown, along with the motor endplate distribution. Note that each layer has a continuous row of endplates that does not subdivide the muscle into compartments. The locations of the horizontal sections are also shown (1-4).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. (A) Representative immunoblots of the mouse masseter MyHC. Immunoblots are shown for types II, IIa, and IIb MyHC isoforms with the use of MY32, SC-71, and BF-F3, respectively. (B) The normalized integrated optical densities (IOD) of mouse masseter muscle fiber MyHC contents of six different regions were calculated and are shown for the two major MyHC isoforms, IIa and IIb. Note the general distribution of IIa MyHC in the muscle fibers of the anterior regions of the masseter, while IIb predominates in the posterior region.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Representative sections of female and male masseter muscles immunostained for the MyHC isoform type IIa (A) or IIb (C). Images have been inverted for easier visualization of immunofluorescently stained fibers. Note that immunostained fibers for IIa are localized mainly to the anterior and deep regions of the masseter, and that different size populations of fibers can be identified. Type IIb immunostained fibers are localized mainly to the posterior regions of the masseter. Fibers expressing the type IIb isoform appear larger than those expressing IIa and are fairly uniform in size. Histograms of the minimum cross-sectional fiber diameter are shown for the anterior and posterior regions for IIa MyHC (B) and the posterior region for IIb (D). Note the anterior and posterior region differences in fiber diameter distributions for the female IIa MyHC, while no difference was found for the male.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Representative maps of regions within transverse sections of the female (A and C) and male (B and D) masseter that contained muscle fibers expressing type IIa (A and B) or IIb (C and D) MyHC were generated by the segmentation of immunostained fibers. Sections are displayed from ventral to dorsal. The histogram illustrates the percent area of each section occupied by fibers expressing the MyHC isoform, as well as the percent of the total area occupied. Note that, in both the male and female, fibers expressing type IIa MyHC are localized to the more anterior and ventral regions of the muscle and are absent from the superficial layer. Expression of the type IIa isoform is more pronounced in the female than in the male. Fibers expressing type IIb MyHC are localized to the posterior and dorsal regions of the muscle, and the expression is more pronounced in the male than in the female.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 81, No. 1, 33-38 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?