This Article Figures Only Free Full Text Free Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Meikle, M.C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meikle, M.C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Remodeling the Dentofacial Skeleton: The Biological Basis of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Department of Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, PO Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand; murray.meikle{at}z

Orthodontic tooth movement is dependent upon the remodeling of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone by mechanical means. Facial sutures are also fibrous articulations, and by remodeling these joints, one can alter the positional relationships of the bones of the facial skeleton. As might be expected from the structure and mobility of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), this articulation is more resistant to mechanical deformation, and whether functional mandibular displacement can alter the growth of the condyle remains controversial. Clinical investigations of the effects of the Andresen activator and its variants on dentofacial growth suggest that the changes are essentially dento-alveolar. However, with the popularity of active functional appliances, such as the Herbst and twin-block based on ’jumping the bite’, attention has focused on how they achieve dentofacial change. Animal experimentation enables informed decisions to be made regarding the effects of orthodontic treatment on the facial skeleton at the tissue, cellular, and molecular levels. Both rat and monkey models have been widely used, and the following conclusions can be drawn from such experimentation: (1) Facial sutures readily respond to changes in their mechanical environment; (2) anterior mandibular displacement in rat models does not increase the mitotic activity of cells within the condyle to be of clinical significance, and (3) mandibular displacement in non-human primates initiates remodeling activity within the TMJ and can alter condylar growth direction. This last conclusion may have clinical utility, particularly in an actively growing child.

Key Words: facial sutures • temporomandibular joint • condylar cartilage • articular remodeling • functional appliances

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 86, No. 1, 12-24 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Embree, T. M. Kilts, M. Ono, C. A. Inkson, F. Syed-Picard, M. A. Karsdal, A. Oldberg, Y. Bi, and M. F. Young Biglycan and Fibromodulin Have Essential Roles in Regulating Chondrogenesis and Extracellular Matrix Turnover in Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2010; 176(2): 812 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Meikle Northcroft Memorial Lecture 2007. A century of progress: advances in orthodontics since the foundation of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics J. Orthod., September 1, 2008; 35(3): 176 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wadhwa and S. Kapila TMJ Disorders: Future Innovations in Diagnostics and Therapeutics J Dent Educ., August 1, 2008; 72(8): 930 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Relevant research from non-orthodontic journals J. Orthod., June 1, 2007; 34(2): 137 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]