This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hujoel, P.P. Articles by Loesche, W.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hujoel, P.P. Articles by Loesche, W.J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Dental Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Dental Flossing and Interproximal Caries: a Systematic Review

¹ Department of Dental Public Health Sciences and
² Department of Epidemiology, School of Dentistry, Box 357475. University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
³ Institute of Social Medicine, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
⁴ Division of Practice Administration, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; and
⁵ School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Correspondence: ^* corresponding author, hujoel{at}u.washington.edu

Our aim was to assess, systematically, the effect of flossing on interproximal caries risk. Six trials involving 808 subjects, ages 4 to 13 years, were identified. There were significant study-to-study differences and a moderate to large potential for bias. Professional flossing performed on school days for 1.7 years on predominantly primary teeth in children was associated with a 40% caries risk reduction (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.76; p-value, < 0.001). Both three-monthly professional flossing for 3 years (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–1.19; p-value, 0.32) and self-performed flossing in young adolescents for 2 years (relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85–1.20; p-value, 0.93) did not reduce caries risk. No flossing trials in adults or under unsupervised conditions could be identified. Professional flossing in children with low fluoride exposures is highly effective in reducing interproximal caries risk. These findings should be extrapolated to more typical floss-users with care, since self-flossing has failed to show an effect.

Key Words: dental caries • interproximal dental caries • dental floss • dental devices • home care • controlled trials • review • meta-analysis

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 4, 298-305 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. P. Hujoel, L. G. Zina, S. A.S. Moimaz, and J. Cunha-Cruz Infant Formula and Enamel Fluorosis: A Systematic Review J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2009; 140(7): 841 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.-M. Bollen, J. Cunha-Cruz, D. W. Bakko, G. J. Huang, and P. P. Hujoel The Effects of Orthodontic Therapy on Periodontal Health: A Systematic Review of Controlled Evidence J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2008; 139(4): 413 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]