This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pitts, N.B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pitts, N.B. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Modern Concepts of Caries Measurement

Centre for Clinical Innovations and Dental Health Services Research Unit, University of Dundee, The Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4BF, Scotland, UK; n.b.pitts{at}dundee.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

Following the consideration of several recent systematic and other reviews, there is a growing professional and scientific consensus that caries measurement methodology in caries clinical trials (CCT) should be updated to reflect progress made elsewhere in cariology. In this paper, therefore, "modern" means accepted in contemporary dental research and dental practice on the basis of sound research evidence—not necessarily new or requiring the use of new technology. Caries measurement should be seen in the context of the objectives of modern clinical caries management and the continuum of disease states, ranging from sub-surface carious changes through to more advanced lesions. Measurement concepts can be applied to at least three levels: the tooth surface, the individual, or the group/population. All are relevant to CCTs. Modern clinical caries management can be seen as comprised of seven discrete but linked steps (Steps 2, 3, and 4 are directly concerned with measurement.): (1) ‘Caries detection’ represents a yes/no decision as to whether caries is present; (2) lesion measurement assesses defined stages of the caries process, taking into account the histopatholgical morphology and appearance of different sizes and types of lesion and the diagnostic threshold(s) being used; (3) lesion monitoring by repeated measures at a series of examinations is used when lesions are less advanced than the stage judged to require operative intervention (A comparison of serial measurements permits the efficacy of preventive care aiming either to arrest or to reverse the lesion to be assessed.); (4) caries activity measures would be very valuable, but are relatively poorly developed and tested at present; (5) diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical decision-making are the important human processes in which all the information obtained from steps 1 to 4 is synthesised; (6) interventions/treatments, both preventive and operative, are now routinely used for caries management; and (7) outcome of caries control/management assesses caries management by examining evidence on the long-term outcomes. A challenge for the future is to define a range of optimal caries measurement methods—in use or in development in recent trials, in clinical practice, and/or in caries epidemiology—that will best contribute to more efficient, modern caries clinical trials.

Key Words: caries measurement • caries detection • caries monitoring • caries actvity

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. suppl 1, C43-C47 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301S09


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. S. Kornman Diagnostic and Prognostic Tests for Oral Diseases: Practical Applications J Dent Educ., May 1, 2005; 69(5): 498 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-C.D.N.J.M. Huysmans and C. Longbottom The Challenges of Validating Diagnostic Methods and Selecting Appropriate Gold Standards Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C48 - C52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]