This Article Figures Only Free Full Text Free Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ayuse, T. Articles by Schwartz, A.R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ayuse, T. Articles by Schwartz, A.R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mouth-opening Increases Upper-airway Collapsibility without Changing Resistance during Midazolam Sedation

¹ Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Dept. of Clinical Physiology, 1-7-1 sakamoto Nagasaki-shi, 852-8588, Japan; and
² The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Johns Hopkins Sleep Disorders Center, Baltimore, MD, USA;

Correspondence: ^* corresponding author, ayuse{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp

Sedative doses of anesthetic agents affect upper-airway function. Oral-maxillofacial surgery is frequently performed on sedated patients whose mouths must be as open as possible if the procedures are to be accomplished successfully. We examined upper-airway pressure-flow relationships in closed mouths, mouths opened moderately, and mouths opened maximally to test the hypothesis that mouth-opening compromises upper-airway patency during midazolam sedation. From these relationships, upper-airway critical pressure (Pcrit) and upstream resistance (Rua) were derived. Maximal mouth-opening increased Pcrit to –3.6 ± 2.9 cm H₂O compared with –8.7 ± 2.8 (p = 0.002) for closed mouths and –7.2 ± 4.1 (p = 0.038) for mouths opened moderately. In contrast, Rua was similar in all three conditions (18.4 ± 6.6 vs. 17.7 ± 7.6 vs. 21.5 ± 11.6 cm H₂O/L/sec). Moreover, maximum mouth-opening produced an inspiratory airflow limitation at atmosphere that was eliminated when nasal pressure was adjusted to 4.3 ± 2.7 cm H₂O. We conclude that maximal mouth-opening increases upper-airway collapsibility, which contributes to upper-airway obstruction at atmosphere during midazolam sedation.

Key Words: critical pressure • conscious sedation • upper airway • mouth opening • mandibular position • sleep apnea

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. 9, 718-722 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300912


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Schwartz, S. P. Patil, S. Squier, H. Schneider, J. P. Kirkness, and P. L. Smith Obesity and upper airway control during sleep J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2010; 108(2): 430 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ayuse, Y. Hoshino, S. Kurata, T. Ayuse, H. Schneider, J. P. Kirkness, S. P. Patil, A. R. Schwartz, and K. Oi The Effect of Gender on Compensatory Neuromuscular Response to Upper Airway Obstruction in Normal Subjects Under Midazolam General Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1209 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Schwartz, J. Kirkness, and P. Smith Extraluminal tissue pressure: what does it mean? J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 5 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kairaitis, R. Stavrinou, R. Parikh, J. R. Wheatley, and T. C. Amis Mandibular advancement decreases pressures in the tissues surrounding the upper airway in rabbits J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 349 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]