| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Effectiveness of Single-surface ART Restorations in the Permanent Dentition: A Meta-analysis
1 WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Care Planning and Future Scenarios, University of Nijmegen, College of Dental Sciences, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Correspondence: * corresponding author, j.frencken{at}dent.umcn.nl Over the past few years, there has been an increase in the number of studies reporting on various aspects of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. Five randomized clinical trials in which ART restorations with glass ionomers were compared with amalgam restorations in permanent teeth for a maximum period of 3 yrs constituted the database. This meta-analysis divided the publications into early (1987–1992) and late (1995-) studies on the basis of improvements in the approach. The analysis showed that, in the early studies, single-surface amalgam restorations survived statistically significantly longer than comparable ART restorations after 1, 2, and 3 yrs. This trend did not continue into the late group of studies; no statistically significant difference between the 2 types of restorations was found. Based on the available data, it appears that there is no difference in survival results between single-surface ART restorations and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 yrs.
Key Words: dental caries atraumatic restorative treatment ART permanent teeth meta-analysis
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. 2,
120-123 (2004) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|||||||||||||||

