This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bartlett, J.D. Articles by Smith, C.E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bartlett, J.D. Articles by Smith, C.E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Minerals Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Decreased Mineral Content in MMP-20 Null Mouse Enamel is Prominent During the Maturation Stage

¹ Department of Cytokine Biology and ² Department of Biomineralization, The Forsyth Institute, 140 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA; and
³ Laboratory for the Study of Calcified Tissues and Biomaterials, Faculté de médecine dentaire, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7;

Correspondence: ^* corresponding author, jbartlett{at}forsyth.org

During enamel development, matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP-20, enamelysin) is expressed early during the secretory stage as the enamel thickens, and kallikrein-4 (KLK-4, EMSP1) is expressed later during the maturation stage as the enamel hardens. Thus, we investigated whether the physical properties of the secretory-/maturation-stage MMP-20 null enamel were significantly different from those of controls. We demonstrated that although, in relative terms, the weight percent of mature mineral in the MMP-20 null mouse enamel was only 7–16% less than that in controls, overall the enamel mineral was reduced by about 50%, and its hardness was decreased by 37%. Percent mineral content by weight was assessed at 3 different developmental stages. Remarkably, the biggest difference in mineral content between MMP-20 null and controls occurred in the nearly mature enamel, when MMP-20 is normally no longer expressed. This suggests that MMP-20 acts either directly or indirectly to facilitate the removal of maturation-stage enamel proteins.

Key Words: enamelysin • amelogenin • amelogenesis • FTIR • microhardness

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. 12, 909-913 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Simmer, Y. Hu, R. Lertlam, Y. Yamakoshi, and J. C.-C. Hu Hypomaturation Enamel Defects in Klk4 Knockout/LacZ Knockin Mice J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 2009; 284(28): 19110 - 19121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C.-C. Hu, Y. Hu, C. E. Smith, M. D. McKee, J. T. Wright, Y. Yamakoshi, P. Papagerakis, G. K. Hunter, J. Q. Feng, F. Yamakoshi, et al. Enamel Defects and Ameloblast-specific Expression in Enam Knock-out/lacZ Knock-in Mice J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10858 - 10871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Zhu, M. L. Paine, W. Luo, P. Bringas Jr., and M. L. Snead Altering Biomineralization by Protein Design J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 21173 - 21182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]