This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Proeschel, P.A. Articles by Raum, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Proeschel, P.A. Articles by Raum, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Task-dependence of Jaw Elevator and Depressor Co-activation

Department of Prosthodontics, University Dental Clinic, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Glückstrasse 11, D 91054 Erlangen, Germany;

Correspondence: ^* corresponding author, peter.proeschel{at}rzmail.uni-erlangen.de

Elevator muscle activity per unit bite-force has been shown to be higher in chewing than in isometric biting. We tested the hypothesis that surplus elevator activity is evoked in response to a possible co-activation of jaw-opener muscles during the masticatory power stroke. In 32 subjects, digastric and bilateral masseter and temporalis activities were recorded during unilateral chewing of test foods, isometric biting on a force transducer, and during balancing of the jaw against maximum effort of depressor muscles. During elevator peak effort in chewing, the digastric activity was 113% higher than during peak effort in isometric biting. Comparison of balancing and chewing trials revealed that a 6% increase of elevator activity would suffice to compensate for this increased depressor action. Elevator activity in chewing, however, was up to 130% higher than in clenching. We conclude that depressor counteraction could have only a minor influence on the generation of surplus muscle activity in chewing.

Key Words: antagonistic co-activation • masticatory muscles • EMG • force-estimation

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 82, No. 8, 617-620 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910308200809


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?