This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Xu, H.H.K. Articles by Schumacher, G.E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xu, H.H.K. Articles by Schumacher, G.E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB SILVER COMPOUNDS SILVER, ELEMENTAL Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Three-body Wear of a Hand-consolidated Silver Alternative to Amalgam

Paffenbarger Research Center, Building 224, Room A-153, American Dental Association Health Foundation

EC Eichmiller

Paffenbarger Research Center, Building 224, Room A-153, American Dental Association Health Foundation

A.A. Giuseppetti

Paffenbarger Research Center, Building 224, Room A-153, American Dental Association Health Foundation

L.K. Ives

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA

E.E. Parry

Paffenbarger Research Center, Building 224, Room A-153, American Dental Association Health Foundation

G.E. Schumacher

Paffenbarger Research Center, Building 224, Room A-153, American Dental Association Health Foundation

Recent studies have investigated a mercury-free silver alternative to amalgam, but the silver powders required a relatively high compaction pressure to consolidate. The aim of the present study was to consolidate a precipitated silver powder into a cohesive solid using an air-driven pneumatic condenser fitted with an amalgam plugger at a clinically realistic load, and to study the mechanisms and rates of three-body wear of the consolidated silver in comparison with that of an amalgam. The silver powder was annealed, rinsed with a dilute acid, and consolidated either in a prepared tooth cavity or in a specimen mold at a load of 15 N. A four-station wear machine was used where each specimen was immersed in a slurry containing polymethyl methacrylate beads, then a steel pin was loaded and rotated against the specimen at a maximum load of 76 N. The flexural strength in MPa (mean ± SD; n = 10) was 86 ± 20 for amalgam, 181 ± 45 for silver with a polished surface, and 202 ± 21 for silver with a burnished surface. After 4 x 105 wear cycles, the wear scar depth in µm was 134 ± 54 for amalgam, 143 ± 8 for polished silver, and 131 ± 9 for burnished silver, which were not significantly different (Tukey's multiple comparison test; family confidence coefficient = 0.95). SEM examination revealed cracks and fracture pits in the worn surface of amalgam, in contrast to a smooth surface in silver. Wear and material removal in amalgam occurred by microfracture and dislodgement of cracked segments, while wear in the silver occurred by ductile deformation and flow of materials. To conclude, the consolidated silver possesses a three-body wear resistance similar to that of amalgam, and a higher resistance to wear-induced damage and cracking than amalgam. The mechanism of wear in amalgam is microfracture and material dislodgement, while that in consolidated silver is ductile deformation and flow of material.

Key Words: amalgam alternative • clinical hand consolidation • damage modes • silver • three-body • wear mechanism

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 78, No. 9, 1560-1567 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780091101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?