This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Locker, D. Articles by Jokovic, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Locker, D. Articles by Jokovic, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Three-year Changes in Self-perceived Oral Health Status in an Older Canadian Population

Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1G6, Canada

A. Jokovic

Community Dental Health Services Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1G6, Canada

Although change is a central goal of oral health care interventions, little attention has yet been paid to change in self-perceptions of oral health status. This is an important omission, given the current emphasis on assessing health outcomes. This paper reports the results of a study which examined changes over a period of three years in self-perceived oral health among 611 community-dwelling Canadians aged 50 years and over. Change in self-perceptions was measured by means of a global transition item and change scores derived from repeat administrations of four subjective oral health status indicators. Overall, 20.5% reported that their oral health had deteriorated over the three-year observation period, 68.5% that it had remained the same, and 10.5% that it had improved. There was a significant association between these global change categories and change scores for the four subjective indicators. Because of the small number of edentulous subjects, the analysis of baseline characteristics predicting change was confined to dentate subjects. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were used to compare the two groups reporting change with those whose oral health status remained stable over the observation period. The results suggest that, when compared with this reference group, those who deteriorated and those who improved were similar in some respects but distinct in others. Those who improved appeared to have specific oral conditions at baseline causing pain. Those who deteriorated had poor oral health in general and came from more disadvantaged backgrounds. However, the explanatory power of logistic regression models predicting change in self-perceived oral health was poor when judged in terms of model sensitivities. This was to be expected, given that the models did not include variables documenting the incidence of disease, receipt of dental care, or changes in social and personal circumstances over the observation period.

Key Words: oral health status • older adults • longitudinal study.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 76, No. 6, 1292-1297 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345970760060901


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?