Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holland, G.R.
Right arrow Articles by Pehowich, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holland, G.R.
Right arrow Articles by Pehowich, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Quantitative Morphological Comparison of Cat Lingual Nerve Repair Using Epineurial Sutures or Entubulation

G.R. Holland

Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, 1011 N. University, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078

D. Andrade

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, Canada

K.G. Smith

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA, England

S. Lahl

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, Canada

P.P. Robinson

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA, England

E. Pehowich

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, Canada

Since lingual nerves may be transected during a variety of oral surgical procedures, including third molar removal, we have investigated two possible methods of repair. Quantitative morphological observations were made on feline chorda tympani and lingual nerves proximal and distal to transection injuries repaired either by epineurial suturing or by insertion of the cut ends into a perforated silicon tube. Proximal to the repair, the most prominent difference was an increase in the number of myelinated axons in the lingual nerve following epineurial suturing but not entubulation. Proximal to the repair site, the number of non-myelinated axons increased in comparison with controls in both chorda tympani and lingual nerves after both procedures, though the difference was statistically significant only in the lingual nerve proximal to entubulation. Distal to the injury, both types of repair showed a reduction in the number, size, and sheath thickness of myelinated axons in comparison with unoperated controls, but the difference in numbers was statistically signficant only distal to repair by entubulation. The number of non-myelinated axons distal to the repair sites was much higher than that in controls, the difference being greater distal to entubulation repair. There were more axons per Remak bundle distal to entubulation repair than to epineurial suturing, suggesting, perhaps, that fewer axons would ultimately become myelinated. Though the morphological differences between the two repair techniques are not as striking as the parallel electrophysiological differences reported previously (Smith and Robinson, 1995a,b), they are consistent with them and support the conclusion that, for transected lingual and chorda tympani nerves, epineurial suturing is the preferred approach. Key words: lingual nerve, injury, oral surgery, taste.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 75, No. 3, 942-948 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750031201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CROBMHome page
G.R. Holland
Experimental Trigeminal Nerve Injury
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1996; 7(3): 237 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]