Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fogle, L.L.
Right arrow Articles by Glaros, A.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fogle, L.L.
Right arrow Articles by Glaros, A.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Contributions of Facial Morphology, Age, and Gender to EMG Activity Under Biting and Resting Conditions: A Canonical Correlation Analysis

L.L. Fogle

University of Iowa, School of Dentistry

A.G. Glaros

Combined BA/DDS Program, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 650 East 25th Street, Kansas City, MO 64108

Theoretical studies suggest that facial morphology may confer a mechanical advantage to particular individuals during force production, but not during rest. However, prior studies on the relationship between facial morphology and EMG suffer from various methodological limitations. We examined the hypothesis that facial morphology variables contribute significantly and meaningfully to the variance in masticatory muscle EMG when subjects produce specific levels of interocclusal force, but not when subjects are at rest. Measures of facial morphology included gonial angle, ramus height, and maxillary height, as determined from lateral cephalograms. EMG data were obtained from surface electrodes placed on masseter and temporalis sites. Subjects (N = 96) sat in a darkened, sound-attenuated room while they watched a seven-minute segment of a movie. EMG activity obtained during the last two minutes was used as a baseline period. Using the central incisors, subjects then provided five different force levels ranging from 6.5 to 48 1b in random order on a bite-force device while EMG data were collected. A canonical correlation analysis, performed on the set of predictor variables (age, gender, and facial morphology measurements) and the set of criterion variables (EMG data), showed a significant canonical correlation between the two variable sets while biting, but not at rest. Age, but not the facial morphology variables, was highly related to the canonical variate. The data suggest that facial morphology variables examined in this study do not exert a meaningful influence on EMG data, at least when the task involves biting with the incisors over a broad range of bite forces obtained from a sample of subjects who vary deliberately with respect to age and gender.

Key Words: facial morphology • bite force • canonical correlation

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 74, No. 8, 1496-1500 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345950740081001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Food Science and Technology InternationalHome page
R. Gonzalez, I. Montoya, and J. Carcel
Review: the Use of Electromyography on Food Texture Assessment
Food Science and Technology International, December 1, 2001; 7(6): 461 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]