This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Blanksma, N.G. Articles by van Eijden, T.M.G.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blanksma, N.G. Articles by van Eijden, T.M.G.J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Electromyographic Heterogeneity in the Human Temporalis and Masseter Muscles during Static Biting, Open\ Close Excursions, and Chewing

Department of Functional Anatomy, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Meibergdreef 15,1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

T.M.G.J. van Eijden

Department of Functional Anatomy, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Meibergdreef 15,1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

The human temporalis and masseter muscles are not activated homogeneously during static bite force tasks. In this study, we studied the possible existence of regional differences in these muscles under dynamic conditions. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded by means of bipolar fine-wire electrodes. Six electrodes were inserted into the temporalis muscle and three into the masseter muscle. Recordings were made during maximal-effort intercuspal and incisal static clenches, open\close excursions from both the intercuspal and incisal positions, and unilateral gum and licorice chewing on right and left sides. The EMG peak amplitudes and the peak occurrences were compared. During the static clenches and the open\close excursions, no differences could be demonstrated between the regions of the temporalis muscle. However, during the chewing tasks, the anterior and posterior regions behaved differently. Throughout almost all tasks, both superficial and deep parts could be distinguished in the masseter muscle. A further division of the deep masseter was task-dependent. In both the temporalis and masseter muscles, maximal activity (100%) was reached during intercuspal clenches. The average activity declined to 35% of the maximal activity in the temporalis muscle, to 47% in the deep, and to 86% in the superficial masseter during incisal clenches. During all chewing tasks, the EMG peak activity of the anterior temporalis and the superficial masseter muscles was higher in the working than in the balancing condition. The general finding was that different regions were preferentially activated, according to task. The detailed regional specialization previously observed during static bite force tasks could not be demonstrated in the present study.

Key Words: electromyography • heterogeneity • masseter muscle • temporalis muscle

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 74, No. 6, 1318-1327 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345950740061201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Grunheid, G. E. J. Langenbach, J. A. M. Korfage, A. Zentner, and T. M. G. J. van Eijden The adaptive response of jaw muscles to varying functional demands Eur J Orthod, December 1, 2009; 31(6): 596 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. F. Ross, R. Dharia, S. W. Herring, W. L. Hylander, Z.-J. Liu, K. L. Rafferty, M. J. Ravosa, and S. H. Williams Modulation of mandibular loading and bite force in mammals during mastication J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2007; 210(6): 1046 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. Lapatki, R. Oostenveld, J. P. Van Dijk, I. E. Jonas, M. J. Zwarts, and D. F. Stegeman Topographical Characteristics of Motor Units of the Lower Facial Musculature Revealed by Means of High-Density Surface EMG J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 342 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. van Wessel, G. E. J. Langenbach, N. Kawai, P. Brugman, E. Tanaka, and T. M. G. J. van Eijden Burst characteristics of daily jaw muscle activity in juvenile rabbits J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2005; 208(13): 2539 - 2547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.H. Koolstra DYNAMICS OF THE HUMAN MASTICATORY SYSTEM Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, July 1, 2002; 13(4): 366 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Gonzalez, I. Montoya, and J. Carcel Review: the Use of Electromyography on Food Texture Assessment Food Science and Technology International, December 1, 2001; 7(6): 461 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Phanachet, T. Whittle, K. Wanigaratne, and G. M. Murray Functional Properties of Single Motor Units in Inferior Head of Human Lateral Pterygoid Muscle: Task Relations and Thresholds J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2204 - 2218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N.G. Blanksma, T.M.G.J. van Eijden, L.J. van Ruijven, and W.A. Weijs Electromyographic Heterogeneity in the Human Temporalis and Masseter Muscles during Dynamic Tasks Guided by Visual Feedback Journal of Dental Research, January 1, 1997; 76(1): 542 - 551. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A.J. Zwijnenburg, G.W. Kroon, B. Verbeeten Jr, and M. Naeije Jaw Movement Responses to Electrical Stimulation of Different Parts of the Human Temporalis Muscle Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 1996; 75(10): 1798 - 1803. [Abstract] [PDF]