This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Spears, I.R. Articles by Howard, I.C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Spears, I.R. Articles by Howard, I.C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Enamel Anisotropy on the Distribution of Stress in a Tooth

Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom

R. Van Noort

Department of Restorative Dentistry

R.H. Crompton

Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom

G.E. Cardew

Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, University of Sheffield, S10 2SZ, United Kingdom

I.C. Howard

Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, University of Sheffield, S10 2SZ, United Kingdom

Enamel is thought to have highly anisotropic stiffness characteristics, because of its prismatic structure. It is probable that the enamel is stiffer in the prism direction compared with a direction perpendicular to it. The prisms are thought to run approximately perpendicular to the enamel-dentin junction. The curvilinear anisotropy that will result can readily be modeled by TOMECH, a finite element program developed at the University of Sheffield, since curvilinearity of mechanical properties is available as an automated feature of this program. The patterns of stress due to an external load were investigated in two-dimensional abstract models, and in a model of a mandibular second premolar, for both anisotropic and isotropic enamel. Results were compared with the commercial code ANSYS and good agreement obtained. Enamel with anisotropic properties was found to have a profoundly different stress distribution under load when compared with models with isotropic enamel. For isotropic enamel, the load path is directed through the stiff enamel shell, while for anisotropic enamel, the load path is directed into the dentin, as the load path follows the stiff direction ofthe enamel prisms. Thus, if enamel is indeed anisotropic, its function differs greatly from that suggested in previous hypotheses. Enamel with anisotropic material characteristics would provide a hard-wearing protective surface-coating while simultaneously diverting the load away from this brittle, low-tensile-strength phase, thus reducing the potential for tooth fracture.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 72, No. 11, 1526-1531 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345930720111101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. LITONJUA, S. ANDREANA, P. J. BUSH, T. S. TOBIAS, and R. E. COHEN Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2003; 134(7): 845 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I.R. Spears A Three-dimensional Finite Element Model of Prismatic Enamel: A Re-appraisal of the Data on the Young's Modulus of Enamel Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 1997; 76(10): 1690 - 1697. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T.W.P. Korioth and A. Versluis Modeling the Mechanical Behavior of the Jaws and Their Related Structures By Finite Element (Fe) Analysis Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1997; 8(1): 90 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]