This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hujoel, P.P. Articles by DeRouen, T.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hujoel, P.P. Articles by DeRouen, T.A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Determination and Selection of the Optimum Number of Sites and Patients for Clinical Studies

Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, SM-35, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

T.A. DeRouen

Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, SM-35, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

Calculating required sample sizes is a critical step in the design of any study. For dental studies, the sample size needs to be specified at two levels: (1) the number of patients (n) enrolled in the study, and (2) the average number of sites (m) examined per patient. In general, m and n should be selected in such a way that the precision of the research findings is maximized, while the cost of the study is minimized. This objective can be realized by taking stock of the components of variation and the costs involved with enrolling patients and examining sites. The research cost for n patients ($C₁/ patient), at an average of m sites per patient ($C₂/site), can usually be approximated by n C₁ + nm C2. The precision varies as a function of the variance components, m, and n. To optimize precision for a fixed cost, the average number of sites examined per patient (m_opt) should be approximately equal towhere p is the within-patient correlation coefficient of the site-specific variable measured. When m_opt is approximately equal to or in excess of the average number of sites availableper patient, whole-mouth examinations are indicated. When m_opt is considerably smaller than the average number of sites available, the sample of optimum size should be obtained by some random mechanism. Examination of a number of sites considerably different from m_opt results in a waste of resources, regardless of the number of patients studied. Standard statistical analyses for determination of the patient sample size required to obtain a pre-specified precision or power are discussed.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 71, No. 8, 1516-1521 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345920710081001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?