This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kidd, E.A.M. Articles by O'Hara, J.W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kidd, E.A.M. Articles by O'Hara, J.W. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Caries Status of Occlusal Amalgam Restorations with Marginal Defects

Department of Conservative Dentistry, United Medical and Dental Schools, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, England

J.W. O'Hara

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39216

The purpose of this study was to examine histologically occlusal amalgam restorations with both defective and sound margins for comparison of their caries status. Thirty extracted teeth with occlusal amalgam restorations were sectioned so that a ditched and a clinically sound margin could be examined on the same tooth in the mouth. Histological examination showed a low prevalence of caries lesions in the outer enamel. However, lesions were present in the enamel of the cavity wall in 54% of specimens, whether the margin was defective or sound. If the results of this study are applicable to all occlusal amalgams with defective margins, it would appear that a defective margin alone is not an indication that a restoration needs to be replaced.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 69, No. 6, 1275-1277 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690061001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. A. MJOR Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2005; 136(10): 1426 - 1433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.W. Osborne and J.B. Summitt Letter To the Editor Journal of Dental Research, February 1, 1998; 77(2): 340 - 340. [PDF]

				L. Ozer and A. Thylstrup What is Known About Caries in Relation to Restorations as a Reason for Replacement? a Review Advances in Dental Research, December 1, 1995; 9(4): 394 - 402. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E.A.M. Kidd, S. Joyston-Bechal, and D. Beighton Marginal Ditching and Staining as a Predictor of Secondary Caries Around Amalgam Restorations: A Clinical and Microbiological Study Journal of Dental Research, May 1, 1995; 74(5): 1206 - 1211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Asaoka Effects of Creep Value and Occlusal Force on Marginal Adaptation of Amalgam Filling Journal of Dental Research, September 1, 1994; 73(9): 1539 - 1545. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E.R. Hewlett, K.A. Atchison, S.C. White, and V. Flack Radiographic Secondary Caries Prevalence in Teeth with Clinically Defective Restorations Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 1993; 72(12): 1604 - 1608. [Abstract] [PDF]