This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Southard, T.E. Articles by Tolley, E.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Southard, T.E. Articles by Tolley, E.A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Variation of Approximal Tooth Contact Tightness with Postural Change

Department of Orthodontics, The University of Tennessee, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38163

K.A. Southard

Department of Orthodontics, The University of Tennessee, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38163

E.A. Tolley

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The University of Tennessee, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38163

In order to investigate the role played by posture in determining posterior dental contact tightness, we measured contact tightness of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth in ten adult subjects, while each was initially seated upright, after each had assumed a supine posture for two h, and finally after each had returned to an upright posture for two h. The technique used for measurement of contact tightness was based on frictional force concepts and consisted of the recording of the force required to withdraw a 0.038-mm-thick stainless-steel strip that had been slipped into each contact. A decreased mean tightness of all maxillary and mandibular contacts followed the change from an upright to a supine posture. The most significant decrease (-32%) occurred at the mandibular first molar-second premolar contact, and the smallest decrease (-10%) occurred at the mandibular first premolar-canine contact. An increased mean tightness of all maxillary and mandibular contacts followed a return to an upright posture. The most significant increase (20%) occurred at the maxillary first molar-second premolar contact, and the smallest increase (8%) occurred at the maxillary first premolar-canine contact. We conclude that posterior dental contact tightness, generally regarded by dentists as a static feature of occlusion, varies significantly as a function of posture.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 69, No. 11, 1776-1779 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690111301


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T.W.P. Korioth and A.G. Hannam Deformation of the Human Mandible During Simulated Tooth Clenching Journal of Dental Research, January 1, 1994; 73(1): 56 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF]