This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jenkins, G.N. Articles by Edgar, W.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jenkins, G.N. Articles by Edgar, W.M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Effect of Daily Gum-chewing on Salivary Flow Rates in Man

Department of Oral Biology, Dental School, University of Newcastle, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AJ, England, Faculty of Dentistiy, University of Toronto, 124 Edward Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1G6

W.M. Edgar

Department of Oral Biology, Dental School, University of Newcastle, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AJ, England, School of Dental Surgery, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX, England

Following reports of increased salivary gland size and increased function, induced by increased mastication in animals, the effects of long-term, frequent gum-chewing on resting and stimulated flow rates were studied in human volunteers in separate experiments in Newcastle upon Tyne and in Toronto. In both experiments, unstimulated and stimulated saliva flow rates were measured in student volunteers at intervals of one or two weeks over a baseline period. Approximately half of the subjects were then given sugarless gum to be chewed (four pieces per day) over the experimental period; controls refrained from vigorous mastication. During (and, in Newcastle, after) the experimental period, salivary flow rates were measured at intervals, as before.

In Newcastle unstimulated, but not stimulated, flow rates increased in the gum-chewing group and were still elevated (compared with controls) eight weeks following the experiment. In Toronto, the mean results showed no effect of gum-chewing, but the seven gum-chewers among the 11 subjects with low baseline flow rates (< 0.3 mLlmin) showed a 43% rise in unstimulated flow rate (p 0.05).

The results suggest that increased mastication, in the form of gum-chewing, can increase unstimulated flow rates, especially in those with low salivary function. In addition to short-term beneficial effects of sugarless gum, these long-term effects indicate the possibility of a beneficial effect in caries prevention.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 68, No. 5, 786-790 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345890680050601


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S-S. Chiou and C-D. Kuo Effect of chewing a single betel-quid on autonomic nervous modulation in healthy young adults J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2008; 22(8): 910 - 917. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Imfeld Chewing Gum--Facts and Fiction: a Review of Gum-Chewing and Oral Health Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1999; 10(3): 405 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.M. Edgar and S.M. Higham Role of Saliva in Caries Models Advances in Dental Research, November 1, 1995; 9(3): 235 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W.M. Edgar, S.M. Higham, and R.H. Manning Saliva Stimulation and Caries Prevention Advances in Dental Research, July 1, 1994; 8(2): 239 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M.W.J. Dodds, S.C. Hsieh, and D.A. Johnson The Effect of Increased Mastication by Daily Gum-chewing on Salivary Gland Output and Dental Plaque Acidogenicity Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 1991; 70(12): 1474 - 1478. [PDF]