This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pitts, N.B. Articles by Fyffe, H.E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pitts, N.B. Articles by Fyffe, H.E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effect of Varying Diagnostic Thresholds upon Clinical Caries Data for a Low Prevalence Group

Dental Health Services Research Unit, Department of Periodontology and Community Dentistry, Dental School, Park Place, Dundee DD1 4HR, Scotland

H.E. Fyffe

Dental Health Services Research Unit, Department of Periodontology and Community Dentistry, Dental School, Park Place, Dundee DD1 4HR, Scotland

This study investigated the impact of employing differing diagnostic thresholds on clinical caries data in studies of groups with low caries prevalence. Data from clinical examinations of 287 Hong Kong dental students were analyzed by means of the CARIES microcomputer software package. This software allows for re-calculation of raw data according to three different diagnostic thresholds (D3, D2, and D1). When "enamel" and "initial" lesions (as defined by WHO criteria) were included in the calculation of DMFT, its value increased from 3.0 (D3) to 5.9 (D1), while the percentage of individuals considered "caries-free" decreased from 28.2% to 7.0%. Little change was found in the magnitude of the intra-examiner reproducibility, when calculated at each threshold, for a random 10% of the subjects. It was unfortunately not possible to calculate inter-examiner reproducibility in this study. The use of criteria which might be misinterpreted as being similar, but which use differing effective diagnostic thresholds, can dramatically influence the reported level of dental caries. In view of these findings, it may be necessary for the question of diagnostic thresholds to be re-examined and to receive greater emphasis in future studies.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 67, No. 3, 592-596 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345880670031401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. S. Kornman Diagnostic and Prognostic Tests for Oral Diseases: Practical Applications J Dent Educ., May 1, 2005; 69(5): 498 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N.B. Pitts Modern Concepts of Caries Measurement Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C43 - C47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.I. Ismail Visual and Visuo-tactile Detection of Dental Caries Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C56 - C66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Marshall, S. M. Levy, B. Broffitt, J. J. Warren, J. M. Eichenberger-Gilmore, T. L. Burns, and P. J. Stumbo Dental Caries and Beverage Consumption in Young Children Pediatrics, September 1, 2003; 112(3): e184 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Pierce, R. G. Rozier, and W. F. Vann Jr Accuracy of Pediatric Primary Care Providers' Screening and Referral for Early Childhood Caries Pediatrics, May 1, 2002; 109(5): e82 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Plasencia, B. W. Alderman, A. E. Baron, R. T. Rolfs, and E. J. Boyko A Method to Describe Physician Decision Thresholds and Its Application in Examining the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease Based on Exercise Treadmill Testing Med Decis Making, August 1, 1992; 12(3): 204 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]