This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mauriello, S.M. Articles by Matteson, S.R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mauriello, S.M. Articles by Matteson, S.R. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB ALUMINUM Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of Rare-earth Filters on Patient Exposure and Image Contrast

Department of Dental Ecology, School of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

D.B. Washburn

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

S.R. Matteson

Department of Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Minimizing patient exposure while maintaining a diagnostically acceptable radiograph is a major goal in diagnostic radiography. Rare-earth filters may be the means to achieve this goal due to their "bandpass effect". The purpose of this study was to examine the image contrast effects and exposure reductions for various thicknesses of aluminum, samarium, gadolinium, gadolinium oxysulfide, and gadolinium oxysulfide added to 2.5 mm of aluminum. Trials were conducted on an intra-oral dental x-ray unit (range, 65 to 90 kVp). When compared with conventional aluminum, all of the rare-earth filters provided lower radiation exposures, with gadolinium in the metallic or oxysulfide form providing the lowest exposures. Samarium, at a thickness of 0.127 mm, yielded the highest image contrast. Gadolinium or gadolinium oxysulfide added to 2.5 mm of aluminum resulted in a slight loss of contrast when compared with conventional aluminum filtration. This loss may not be clinically significant, and when coupled with the reduced exposure afforded by these filters, they become viable as acceptable alternatives to aluminum filtration.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 66, No. 8, 1326-1330 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345870660080701


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?