Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, C.O.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reid, C.O.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Some of the Permeability Characteristics of Intact and Tape-stripped Hamster Cheek Pouches in vitro

C.O. Reid

Department of Oral Pathology, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, 31 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, United Kingdom

J. Hardcastle

Department of Physiology, University of Sheffield, Biology Building, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom

C.J. Smith

Department of Oral Pathology, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, 31 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, United Kingdom

Cheek pouches were removed from anesthetized hamsters and were either tape-stripped or left intact and then mounted in Ussing chambers, where they were bathed in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate saline.

A potential difference could be measured across all pouches and was stable for over an hour across the unstripped pouches. The electrical resistance across the unstripped pouches was high (8960 {Omega}.cm2), whereas the resistance across the tape-stripped pouches was significantly lower (p<0.01), suggesting that these pouches are likely to be more permeable than the unstripped pouches.

Reflection coefficients of urea, ethanol, and glycerol were derived by means of streaming potentials. Values for intact pouches were all close to 1 and for tape-stripped pouches were 0.938, 0.822, and 0.509, respectively.

Permeability coefficients for urea and ethanol across intact and tape-stripped pouches were, respectively, 12.5 x 10-9 cm/min; 27.6 x 10-9 cm/min; 2325 x 10 -9 cmlmin ; and 28471 x 10-9 cmlmin.

The hamster cheek pouch has a high electrical resistance; it is an impermeable structure in which the keratin layer appears to provide a major barrier to the passage of water, ions, and certain solutes.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 65, No. 5, 673-676 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345860650050801


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CROBMHome page
C.A. Squier
The Permeability of Oral Mucosa
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1991; 2(1): 13 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
N.A. Tobey, V.J. Schreiner, R.D. Readling, and R.C. Orlando
The Acute Effects of Smokeless Tobacco on Transport and Barrier Function of Buccal Mucosa
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 1988; 67(11): 1414 - 1421.
[Abstract] [PDF]