Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putt, M.S.
Right arrow Articles by Kleber, C.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Putt, M.S.
Right arrow Articles by Kleber, C.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dissolution Studies of Human Enamel Treated with Aluminum Solutions

M.S. Putt

Preventive Dentistry Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 2101 Coliseum Boulevard East, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805

C.J. Kleber

Preventive Dentistry Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 2101 Coliseum Boulevard East, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805

Dissolution tests using human enamel were conducted after treatment with aqueous solutions of various aluminum (Al) salts. All Al compounds, except those which formed stable Al-complexes, greatly decreased enamel dissolution in a pH 4 acetate buffer. A comparison with fluoride compounds demonstrated that Al was equivalent to SnF2 and more effective than NaF and Na2PO3F. Furthermore, the reduction in enamel dissolution produced by Al persisted after more than three hr of successive demineralization, which was twice as long as that observed with a pH 4.5 SnF2 solution.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 64, No. 3, 437-440 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345850640030801
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JDRHome page
M.S. Putt and C.J. Kleber
Effect of pH, Concentration, and Treatment Time of Aluminum Solutions on Acid Dissolution of Enamel
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 1986; 65(11): 1356 - 1358.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JDRHome page
C.J. Kleber and M.S. Putt
Uptake and Retention of Aluminum by Dental Enamel
Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 1985; 64(12): 1374 - 1376.
[Abstract] [PDF]