This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pearce, E.I.F. Articles by Moore, A.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pearce, E.I.F. Articles by Moore, A.J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Remineralization of Softened Bovine Enamel following Treatment of Overlying Plaque with a Mineral-enriching Solution

Dental Research Unit, Medical Research Council of NZ, P.O. Box 27007, Wellington, New Zealand

A.J. Moore

Dental Research Unit, Medical Research Council of NZ, P.O. Box 27007, Wellington, New Zealand

Pre-softened, gauze-covered bovine enamel blocks were worn in the buccal sulcus of five subjects for seven days. Artificial plaque enmeshed in the gauze was treated four times per day for four days with an enzyme-dependent mineralizing solution, resulting in 20-, 10-, and 200-fold increases in Ca, P, and F, respectively. Enamel beneath this mineral-enriched plaque recovered 37% of the hardness lost from pre-softening, while control enamel beneath untreated plaque recovered only 14%. Test enamel contained from five to 13 times as much F as did control enamel in the outer four layers sampled. Even though direct use of the mineralizing solution without the interposition of plaque caused a hardness recovery and F uptake similar to those in test enamel in vivo, a direct solution effect on enamel is not thought to explain the in vivo effects. Plaque treated with the urea-containing solution rapidly reaches a pH > 8, when a precipitate develops, leaving much-reduced ion concentrations in solution. Direct exposure of softened enamel to such a supernatant resulted in reduced hardness recovery and F uptake. It is concluded that the in vivo enamel remineralization was due mainly to the presence of a mineral phase in the overlying plaque. This mineral could have promoted remineralization by creating mildly supersaturated conditions during normal plaque pH cycles.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 64, No. 3, 416-421 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345850640030401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.C. Chow, S. Takagi, and S. Shih Effect of a Two-solution Fluoride Mouthrinse on Remineralization of Enamel Lesions in vitro Journal of Dental Research, March 1, 1992; 71(3): 443 - 447. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.M. ten Cate and J.D.B. Featherstone Mechanistic Aspects of the Interactions Between Fluoride and Dental Enamel Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1991; 2(3): 283 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.C. Margolis, J.H. Duckworth, and E.C. Moreno Composition of Pooled Resting Plaque Fluid from Caries-free and Caries-susceptible Individuals Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 1988; 67(12): 1468 - 1475. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.C. Margolis, J.H. Duckworth, and E.C. Moreno Composition and Buffer Capacity of Pooled Starved Plaque Fluid from Caries-free and Caries-susceptible Individuals Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 1988; 67(12): 1476 - 1482. [Abstract] [PDF]