Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Vree, J.H.P.
Right arrow Articles by Plasschaert, A.J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Vree, J.H.P.
Right arrow Articles by Plasschaert, A.J.M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Science The Influence of Modification of Cavity Design on Distribution of Stresses in a Restored Molar

J.H.P. De Vree

Department of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

M.C.R.B. Peters

Department of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

A.J.M. Plasschaert

Department of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

In this study, two different cavity designs were compared from a mechanical point of view: (a) an axisymmetric model of a conventional class 1 cavity preparation and restoration; and (b) an axisymmetric model of a modified cavity design. The modified design was characterized by a cavo-surface angle (c.s.a.) of approximately 90° and a stepped cavity wall. Using a mathematical model, stresses were calculated by finite element analysis to compare the force distribution. It is concluded that the clinical superiority of the modified cavity design, with respect to the marginal breakdown of the amalgam restoration, can be supported by stress calculations.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 63, No. 10, 1217-1220 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345840630101001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CROBMHome page
K.-J.M. Soderholm, M.J. Tyas, and A. Jokstad
Determinants of Quality in Operative Dentistry
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1998; 9(4): 464 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CROBMHome page
T.W.P. Korioth and A. Versluis
Modeling the Mechanical Behavior of the Jaws and Their Related Structures By Finite Element (Fe) Analysis
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1997; 8(1): 90 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JDRHome page
I.R. Spears, R. Van Noort, R.H. Crompton, G.E. Cardew, and I.C. Howard
The Effects of Enamel Anisotropy on the Distribution of Stress in a Tooth
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 1993; 72(11): 1526 - 1531.
[Abstract] [PDF]