This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ranly, D.M. Articles by Lazzari, E.P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ranly, D.M. Articles by Lazzari, E.P. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB FORMALDEHYDE GLUTARALDEHYDE Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Biochemical Study of Two Bifunctional Reagents as Alternatives to Formocresol

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78284

E.P. Lazzari

Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, Houston, Texas 77025

Two bifunctional reagents, glutaraldehyde and dimethylsuberimidate, were compared to formaldehyde with respect to fixation and modification of protein. Glutaraldehyde proved the superior fixative based on cross-linking and enzyme degradation assays. An immunoprecipitation assay suggests that the reaction products of glutaraldehyde may have altered antigenicity.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 62, No. 10, 1054-1057 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345830620100901


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.M. Ranly, D. Horn, and T. Zislis The Effect of Alternatives to Formocresol on Antigenicity of Proteins Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 1985; 64(10): 1225 - 1228. [Abstract] [PDF]