Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jodaikin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jodaikin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, J.C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effects of Cavity Smear Layer Removal on Experimental Marginal Leakage around Amalgam Restorations

A. Jodaikin

MRC/University of the Witwatersrand, Dental Research Institute, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Johannesburg, South Africa 2001

J.C. Austin

MRC/University of the Witwatersrand, Dental Research Institute, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Johannesburg, South Africa 2001

Unvarnished freshly-packed dental amalgam restorations leak initially. However, with time, a marginal seal is usually effected. It is not known whether the smear layer which forms during cavity preparation is associated with this leakage pattern. This study was undertaken to evaluate experimental marginal leakage around amalgam restorations (left in situ for one and 12 wk) which had been placed in cavities prepared with and without removal of the smear layer in vital and devitalized teeth. The cavities were obturated with two types of dental amalgams, a conventional and a dispersed-phase amalgam. The excised teeth restorations were subjected to a fluorescent dye marginal leakage experiment. All of the short-term specimens leaked severely, but some of the long-term specimens displayed significant sealing properties. No significant differences were found between the two types of amalgams. However, the non-vital tooth specimens and cavities without smear layers displayed significantly improved sealing properties.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 60, No. 11, 1861-1866 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345810600110601


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
M.M. Barakat, J.M. Powers, and R. Yamaguchi
Parameters that Affect in vitro Bonding of Glass-ionomer Liners to Dentin
Journal of Dental Research, September 1, 1988; 67(9): 1161 - 1163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
A. Jodaikin and E.S. Grossman
Experimental Marginal Leakage Around Dental Amalgams Placed in Artificial Cavities
Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 1984; 63(8): 1090 - 1092.
[Abstract] [PDF]